Madhav Mehra on 9/11/2001
Centre For Corproate Governance would be publishing
a professional Journal - CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. The inaugural
issue of the journal CORPORATE GOVERNANCE will be published in
January 2002.
Centre For Corproate Governance - Corporate
Governance for National Resurgence and Global Harmony
Corporates
should be more proactive in checking insider trading
The Financial Express, Tuesday, July 24, 2001
Engines
of National Transformation
The Hindu, Bangalore, Friday, August 17, 2001
"Corporate
governance must go beyond shareholders"
The
Hindu, Business Line, Kolkata, December 29, 2001
CAN
there be a convergence of corporate and public governance? This
question reflects the core of a discussion that is being masterminded
by Dr. Madhav Mehra, President of World Council for Corporate
Governance, on a national scale.
Kolkata,
on Friday, played host to a seminar that discussed, as Dr Mehra
put it, "the power of collaborative governance", from where a
number of gems rolled out. And the city's management cognoscenti
lapped them up.
Western models of corporate governance, it was pointed
out, were mostly based on maximization of shareholder value -
a theory that was not entirely applicable to the world. Indeed,
employees, whose knowledge accounted for 70 per cent of corporate
assets, must be made part of any governance system, it was felt.
Governance,
in other words, must not focus merely on shareholders. According
to the Centre for Corporate Governance, it must also consider
customers and employees who commit their lives for the corporation.
"Traditionally
speaking, the constitution of a company's board of directors is
confined to its shareholders. The aim here is to maximise their
value," said Dr. Mehra. In the current knowledge economy, however,
such a policy could lead to a conflict of interest between stakeholders
and employees.
A
modern corporation, therefore, must create wealth for all stakeholders,
including employees, suppliers and customers.
Despite
all efforts at alleviating poverty, a large part of the world
population was still below the poverty line, while deprivation
and poverty were set to become the greatest threat to business
and industry.
Therefore,
business must involve all sections of stakeholders in working
out the right strategies for collaborative governance.
The
events that took place on September 11 in the US had changed the
world to the extent that people wanted a "complete lifting of
the veil of secrecy" in their financial system.
As
the Centre put it, there was a lesson in this for corporate in
the context of globalization, the latter must help bridge the
gap between winners and losers.
Dr.
Mehra's initiative found endorsement from Lord Swraj Paul, Chairman
of the UK-based Caparo group of companies. In Lord Paul's words,
there was need for transparency and corporate governance in all
aspects of life.
Centre
for Corporate Governance releases guidelines for directors
Social
& environmental reporting shall become part of the company
disclosures as per the guidelines on corporate governance issued
by the Centre for Corporate Governance. The Guidelines were released
yesterday by Lord Swraj Paul at a Seminar on the Power of Collaborative
Governance conducted by Dr. Madhav Mehra, President, World Council
for Corporate Governance at Hotel Maurya Sheraton, New Delhi.
Lord
Swraj Paul stated, "the corporation has a key role to play in
providing employment in public and private sectors, goods and
infrastructure.
The efficiency and accountability of
the corporation is now a matter of both private and public interest
and governance, therefore, comes at the top of the international
agenda."
Addressing
the Chairmen, CEOs and Directors from Navaratna PSU's and top
Indian companies, Dr. Mehra said "no government in the developing
world has the economic resource to overcome the poverty and inequality
inherited by them. If business, as a corporate entity, has to
survive in this age of rising public aspirations, it is of utmost
importance that it collaborates with state, the civil society
to engage in sustainable solutions for our economic, social, environmental
problems."
Dr.
Mehra recommended that companies adopt a triple bottom line approach,
which look after all 3 aspects - profits, people and planet. He
added, that "globalization to be effective, has to work for everyone."
He asked , "in the fiercely competitive market-place when corporates
are scouting for the top 1% highest scorers on competitiveness
and innovativeness as managers or employees, what will happen
to the 99% of the losers?" He said, that "the widening gap between
winners and losers was the biggest threat to the security and
survival of business in a world where non state actors wield awesome
power. Corporations, therefore, had to take a centre-stage role
in building proactive strategies in taking social measures that
bridge this gap between winners and losers."
"Good
governance must think of long-term benefit"
The Hindu, Business Line, Bangalore, Jan. 3, 2002
GOOD
governance should pre-suppose a long-term and sustained benefit
to the society at large through collaborative efforts, rather
than focusing on short-term gains of enhanced value to the shareholders
and efficient management of entities.
Stressing
this theme, speakers at a seminar held on Thursday said that business,
stakeholders and civil society should work towards the triple
bottom-line of profits distributed equitably among people, who
in turn should contribute to protecting the environment. Only
by this reckoning will corporate governance have some value.
This
seminar was inaugurated by the Karnataka Governor Ms Ramadevi,
and addressed by the Chief Justice of Supreme Court, Mr. M.N.
Venkatachaliah.
Others
who spoke include Mr K. Jairaj, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director,
Karnataka State Road, Transport Corporation. Dr. M.R. Rao, Director
IIM, Bangalore, Dr. Madhav Mehra, President of World Council for
Corporate Governance, and Mr. V.V.K. Mani, Regional Manager, The
Hindu.
Mr.
Venkatachaliah said that the receding role of State as a welfare
instrument was an issue that needed to be addressed to relocate
the responsibility of social obligations.
"Globalization
has not brought any marked change in the redistribution of wealth
as can be seen from the fact the income value of the top 20 percent
kept increasing even now.
"CRC will
meet deadline deadline on submission of report"
said Justice
Venkatachalaiah at the Seminar on Power of Colloborative organized
by the Institute of Directors and the Center of Corporate Governance,
New Delhi.
The Hindu, Friday, January 4, 2002
BANGALORE,
JAN 3, The Constitution Review Commission (CRC) will meet the
February 28 deadline for submitting its report, the chairman of
the commission, Mr. M.N. Venkatachalaiah, has said.
The
report would propose the creation of a "non justifiable mechanism"
by which civil society would annually assess the performance of
the Government, he told persuasions on the sidelines of a seminar
"Collaborative governance", here on Thursday.
A
proposal had also been made for setting up a commission on inter-state
commerce, he said. Feedback from various financial institutions
and business bodies would be generated for the purpose, he said.
Hinting
that the report would be free of "controversial issues", Mr. Justice
Venkatachalaiah said the "commission was not formed to rewrite"
the Constitution but to help make governance efficient.
"Where
shall we relocate social obligations in the context of globalization?"
he asked in his talk at the seminar, organized by the Institute
of Directors and the Centre for Corporate Governance, New Delhi.
The
transition from a welfare state to a market economy, with the
Government divesting itself of several functions, the role of
the corporate would be keenly watched, he said.
The
President of the World Council for Corporate Governance, Madhav
Mehra, said the "mismatch between shareholder expectations and
customer aspirations" was at the root of "wealth creation." The
knowledge economy had led to a public that was better informed
on the behavior of companies and there were several examples of
companies violating "social licence," incurring public ire, he
said.
Successful
companies would be those that recognized their responsibilities
to society, and displayed pro-activeness in compliance, he said.
The
Director, Indian Institute of Management, Rammohan Rao, said companies
would have to take a long-term view and not be obsessed with quarterly
results.
The
Chairman of the Constitution Review Commission, M.N. Venkatachaliah
(centre) with the Governor, V.S. Rama Devi, and the President
of the World Council for Corporate Governance, Madhav Mehra, at
a seminar on Collaborative
Shareholders
are not the only owners who matter
Addressing
a group of corporate executives in the UK Dr Mehra spelt out the
WCFCG philosophy. He said "World Council for Corporate Governance
adds an entirely
new dimension to the issue of corporate governance in the knowledge
economy. The role of corporate
governance has vastly changed with the emergence of due
to the knowledge capital. We think that corporate governance is
way beyond disclosures and compliance and calls for a highly innovative
and radical framework. We think that shareholders are not the
only owners who matter. Employees have an equity well in excess
of 70% of the companies assets. Corporations of 21st
Century would need to develop strategies to collaborate with employees,
customers and suppliers to create value for all stakeholders.
With 350 million people still living below the poverty line, we
look at corporate governance as an instrument of not only economic
transformation but also a means of social transformation."
Engines
of National Transformation
by
Harichandan A. A.
The
Hindu, Bangalore, Friday, August 17, 2001
Globally,
corporate organisations are being asked to be more accountable,
practicise self-policing and make financial transactions transparent
and constitutional. They are expected to be partners in the economic
and social transformation of nations.
Corporate
directors then, must embrace radical thinking, aggressive competition and
good corporate governance, says Dr Madhav Mehra, Chairman, World
Quality Council.
He
was speaking to corporate leaders here recently about his favourite
idea - the need to revolutionise the role of corporate directors
to make Indian corporate "engines of national transformation rather
than mere economic entities."
"A
corporate director has civic responsibility. The people who accept
this responsibility, do it conscientiously and well, deserve our
respect as they are serving a nation. But those who as directors
are passive and view their role as mere advisers, are pliable
and pleasant but do not insist on a real monitor's role, do small
service to anyone and deserve little respect"-is what Chancellor
William T. Allen, Corporation Jurist from US, says.
The
views are as valid for corporate directors in India, says Dr Mehra.
He admits he does not have all the answers. His persuasive skill
and the goodwill he has earned through diplomatic perseverance
are his strengths.
The
right thing
Corporations are now being asked to do more than maintain bottomline
profit. Indeed, with "public-private partnership" being the latest
mantra of cash-starved government, businesses are expected to
play role in social transformation of the country.
This
being the case, such business leaders who dare to do the right
thing, must be encouraged, Dr Mehra says. "If we tell people that
it is all right to make mistakes, they too will come up with the
ways of tackling those mistakes. If Thomas Allen Edison
had been forced to give up after his initial failures to create
the electric bulb, the ultimate phenomenal success would never
have seen the light of day," he says.
Corporates
should be more proactive in checking insider trading
The
Financial Express, Tuesday, July 24, 2001
With
decision makers in the corporate sector getting embroiled in controversies,
fear and scepticism reigns the stock
market and business channels. Ensuring transparency and
quality of corporate governance, according to Dr Madhav Mehra,
international management expert and chairman of World Quality
Council, is the only hope to rid the corporate sector of the crisis
and regain lost confidence. In the interview with
Tarun Narayan, Dr Mehra spells out some of the challenges, solutions
and initiatives that business establishments would need to undertake
to enforce a wholesome corporate governance mechanism. Excerpts:
In
India what are the factors acting as deterrents against enforcing
corporate governance?
There
is a lack of strong-willed legislation to convict those corporate
professionals from the top hierarchy who are accused of malafide
indulgence, like insider trading. The laxity in implementing strong
legislative strictures or punishments acts as a major deterrent.
In advanced western nations, chairmen and other top-level officials,
if caught in the act of indulging in insider trading, get convicted
and even face rigorous imprisonment. Sadly,
in India, we do not have such a precedent. The corporate establishments
themselves are not proactive enough to institutionalise a complete
and flawless system of business functioning leading
to good corporate practices.
What are the major implications
that corporates
and economy suffer from as a consequence of non-enforcement of
transparency?
There is a flight of capital
and investments to Southeast Asian nations. Foreign investors
are no longer fun ding their way into Indian corporates due to
the lacklustre image and lack of credibility of some of the Indian
corporates and financial institutions. The stock market has gone
into depression with
bourses consistently registering all-time low since the past few
months. The confidence of the ordinary shareholders, too, has
been dwindling by the day.
With structural limitations
how can an effective corporate governance concept be implemented?
There is no paucity of judiciary
provisions to castigate the offenders and usher accountability
in corporate functioning. It is just that the provisions are not
being implemented with the much needed resolve and speed. Hence,
applying legal solutions to take the crisis to its logical destination
would be one major solution. Second, corporates themselves need
to wake up to the efficacy that value systems, like probity accountability,
honesty and integrity holds, to ensure a transparent a smoothly-run
business enterprise. They should realise that a corporate not
just accountable to the shareholders but also t o employees, customers,
suppliers and lenders. The need to bring into action a collectively
participatory system where each if the mentioned organs feels
a sense of belonging towards the organisation. This would facilitate
a genuine contribution from the multiple communities directly
or indirectly linked wit the business operations. They would lead
to progress in the business, optimism in the market and rise in
GDP due to higher production and income and thereby a macroeconomic
progress in its integrated finality.
What modus operanti do you
suggest to involve employees as part of the decision making process.
The
directors and the other honchos of the company should not
underestimate the capabilities of the employees when it comes
to the decision making process. In the same vein. It is also important
that the employees
are sensitised to the boundaries that they
should not transcend. There should be a single minded and clear
communication to all the employees across hierarchies of the business
and social objectives that the company is planning to execute.
This would make all the employees not
just focus on the jobs but also assist organisation in embarking
on rational decision making initiatives.